In brief
In May 2023, the CNC (Commission des Normes Comptables or Luxembourg Accounting Board) issued a new Q&A (Q&A CNC 23/029) in relation to the accounting aspects of the migration of companies in Luxembourg. The CNC's recommendation is prepared assuming there is an accounting continuity that echoes the legal continuity according to which the transaction is carried out. This Q&A addresses the main questions accounting practitioners may have, together with the presentation of 2 methods, a preferred and an alternative one, for the accounting impact of a migration.
In detail
The following questions are answered by the CNC assuming there is a legal and accounting continuity. The full document can be consulted on the CNC website.
Current accounting laws and regulations do not require preparing or filing an opening accounting situation.
It is to be noted that the Luxembourg notary will most probably require such an opening accounting situation (e.g. for capital requirement). If it is also often necessary for tax reasons or for internal purpose (e.g. new board member), such information will have to be prepared in accordance with Luxembourg accounting frameworks but will neither be filed nor published on the trade register.
As long as the currency used is legal tender, fully convertible and freely usable and issued or guaranteed by a central bank or public authority, entities can continue to use it (see Q&A CNC 22/026(R) for more details).
Point of attention: from a pragmatic perspective, and as addressed by filing of eCDF rules, the choice of the currency is done by reference to ISO 4217.
The CNC mentions that a migration to Luxembourg is based on the principle of continuity of legal personality (Cf: Affaire C-106/16 – Polbud – Wykonawstwo sp. z o.o. – Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 25 octobre 2017). Therefore, there is no dissolution of the foreign entity moving to Luxembourg. Such continuity of the legal personality generally leads to an accounting continuity. In principle, it should lead to the transfer in Luxembourg of all assets, liabilities, expenses, and income as they were before the migration. The CNC however mentions that some exceptions exist, in particular when the valuation methods are not in line with Luxembourg legislation (see question 5 for more details).
Assuming the migration is done with legal and accounting continuity, it has no effect on the financial year as foreseen in the bylaws. The accounting cycle of the entity continues despite the migration.
Therefore, the first annual accounts to which Luxembourg accounting law applies are the annual accounts for the financial year during which the migration takes place. These annual accounts cover the full financial year.
As an example, if the company follows the civil year and migrates in June, the first financial year will run from 1 January to 31 December and Luxembourg accounting laws and regulations will be applicable for the full year.
Upon arrival in Luxembourg, the Luxembourg accounting law applies. In the situation where the accounting principles and valuation policies prior to migration are not compatible with the accounting laws and regulations in Luxembourg, adjustments are needed, The CNC proposes two different methods, a preferred approach and an alternative one.
The preferred method is to adjust all the items in line with the accounting principles and valuation rules. The differences arising from the adjustments should be recorded in the current financial year. In line with the Q&A CNC 21-024(R) the adjustments in relation to previous years should be either:
The alternative method is to consider previous accounting values as the deemed cost for all the concerned items. No adjustments will be required. However, to align the crystallisation of the potential unrealised gain and the prudence principle in Luxembourg, the CNC requires to isolate them in a non-distributable reserve until the realisation of the underlying items. In practice, the CNC precises that this should only be the case for tangible and some financial assets.
In accordance with article 29(2) of the Accounting Law, the presentation of comparative figures is a legal requirement as from the moment the company was in existence before migration.
In accordance with the intangibility of the opening balance sheet, the comparative figures cannot be modified. In case accounting principles prior to migration are not acceptable in Luxembourg and adjustments are made on the year of migration based on the preferred approach (i.e. adjustment to Lux GAAP, refer to question 5), it would be appropriate to analyse the impacts of these adjustments (refer to the Q&A CNC 21-024(R)) and its correlative impact with the comparative figures.
In order to provide clear information, specific information should be disclosed in the notes to the annual accounts to explain the reason why (if any) the comparative figures are not comparable.
Undertakings migrating in Luxembourg are subject to Luxembourg accounting laws and regulations as from the date they migrate and for their full financial year, even if this latter started before the migration.
Therefore, unless the undertaking can benefit from a particular exemption (e.g., supervised by the CSSF), they are subject as from their first year of migration to the Standard Chart of Accounts and filing of the eCDF forms.
Véronique Tinel
Tax Partner, Accounting Compliance, Consolidation Leader, PwC Luxembourg
Tel: +352 621 332 448