Action Plan main measures and timeline
On 8 April 2020, the European Commission (EC) issued a consultation on Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy. This consultation follows up several actions already undertaken by the recently appointed European Commission towards the objective of a greener and more sustainable European economy.
The “Taxonomy Proposal” does not aim at defining or classifying ESG approaches, but tries to define sustainable investments through a focus on the activities financed by a financial product, aiming at defining “environmentally sustainable activities”.
The “Benchmarks Regulation” will amend the Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 (i.e. the Benchmark Regulation) in order to include a “Climate Transition Benchmark” and also an “EU Paris-Aligned Benchmark” definition to impose ESG factors disclosure requirements.
The “Disclosures Regulation” distinguishes between (i) disclosure on sustainability risks applicable to all financial market participants, advisors and all financial products, and (ii) further disclosures applicable to sustainable investments and to products promoting environmental or social characteristics.
Amendments to MiFID suitability tests – ESG preferences
The proposed amendments will modify MiFID II suitability test requirements, asking for a systematic inquiry about investors’ ESG preferences. Whilst amendments to a level 2 text could go relatively rapidly, timing is expected to be aligned with the “Disclosures Regulation” mentioned above due to cross reference between the two texts (sustainable investment definition).
Amendments to MiFID, UCITS and AIFMD to include sustainability risks
Following the mandate granted by the EC, the European Securities and Markets Authority (the “ESMA”) has issued advice on possible amendments to MiFID II, UCITS and AIFMD level 2 texts in order to include references to sustainability risks and factors within organisational requirements, operating conditions and resources, risk management and product governance requirements. Such changes would require all management companies, AIFMs and MiFID firms to review processes and resources as well as to include sustainability risks within risk management processes.
Impact for Asset Managers (“AMs”) – How to surf the wave
Assess interaction with local regulations as well as global developments (US/Asia)
Decide on products strategy (e.g. which proportion to redefine, active or passive, etc.)
Assess strategic impact with benchmark regulation and other EU regulation (SRD II)
Assess impact on current investor base (which percentage are likely to have ESG preference(s)? Sustainable activities products?)
Decide on market positioning and communication strategy
Assess and monitor engagement activities
Update suitability tests as required
Embed ESG within corporate culture
Assess ESG risks and decide upon corporate approach
Review product governance
Interaction with stewardship code
Decide on whether more ESG products (or to remap existing ones) more thematic/sustainable activities
Review existing product range, assess gap and decide on actions
Categorise existing and amend documentation (prospectuses, marketing documents, KIDs)
Launch additional products as required
Decide on whether product label shall be required
Refine target market definition and communicate to intermediaries
Assess current distributors, intermediaries
Adapt distribution network and/or educate intermediaries as required
Review process to assess target market efficiency
Capture engagement activities, ESG activities and sustainable activities within organisation
Establish reporting lines and processes
Decide on communication plan (corporate, products), decide on whether minimalistic approach (versus “telling a story” to investors) and assess on whether to perform impact reporting
Perform gap analysis
Implement product reporting (interact with administrators and other suppliers) process including quality control aspects
Regardless of the journey that is being taken within individual jurisdictions, the sustainability / ESG agenda is not one which can be ignored - this will be a global long-term journey which every country and company will have to take, and therefore it is at the stage of “ESG …. do or die” for every country and for every company. No AM can continue to ignore industry-wide potential divestment costs from fossil fuels, tobacco, controversial weapons, animal testing products etc., and needs to assess the impact of future investments.
For many years, investment decisions were not necessarily aligned with investors’ value or long-term concerns.
In 2019, we surveyed 750 institutional investors and 10,000 retail investors around the world in 2019. In our report “Asset and Wealth Management revolution: investors perspectives", ESG is ranked as the third priority in importance among investors surveyed, as a whole group, and it outranks fees.
Our publication also highlights the expected changes in terms of Governance, Non-ESG products, Distribution, Business processes and operations, Reporting and Investor Engagement.
ESG and sustainability trained resources will be required at all levels of the organisation (from top management, investment, analysts, product design, sales, oversight of delegates and outsourced functions, risk management, reporting, controls function and internal audit).
Recruitment of new talents will be the obvious answer, but skilled resources are limited. In the absence of an available pool of talents, upskilling can be the right tactical answer to this challenge. AMs should also anticipate the skills challenge faced by delegates.