![]() |
Regulations change. New trends emerge. Risk Management structures and processes in Asset Management are subject to improved Governance, more Board responsibilities, and an increase in computation requirements. Demand for transparency and assurance grows when Investment Funds and Management Companies outsource to other organisations their Risk Management components. These service providers face the challenge to provide assurance on their business processes and related controls to their clients. |
![]() |
The recent financial crisis highlighted that the importance of Liquidity Risk Management, as well as the severity and swiftness with which this risk can materialise, had been severely underestimated by the industry, markets and regulators alike. |
![]() |
The finalised Basel III regulation published in December 2010 will have farreaching implications for the banking industry. Many experts believe the inclusion of the liquidity regulation to be the most significant modification, estimated to pose considerable challenges for credit institutions across the globe. Likely effects like disruptions to the interbank market, trapped pools of liquidity in individual territories and increased monitoring and reporting requirements will require banks to fundamentally review and improve their funding and liquidity management frameworks. |
![]() |
On 11 March 2011 the CSSF published the Circular 11/506 (amending the Circular 07/301 on the ICAAP) which defines its requirements in terms of stress testing practices. While stress testing has been expected of banks and investment firms at least since the advent of the ICAAP in early 2007, the new Circular 11/506 now makes it a formal obligation for all institutions to establish a stress testing framework. |
![]() |
If there is one thing that the recent financial crisis has highlighted, it is the importance of a Risk Management framework which is able to deal with risk types beyond those included within Basel II Pillar 1, i.e. Credit, Market and Operational risks. In the light of the Pillar 2 requirements, financial institutions and investment firms are obliged to strengthen their firm-wide Risk Management to foster the development of a robust risk and capital management process. |
![]() |
The final text of the Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive (AIFMD) has been adopted on 11 November, 2010 and member states will be required to transpose the directive in their national laws within two years (i.e. early 2013 at the latest). |
![]() |
Why is GRC important for you? The key purpose of embedding GRC within a business is to manage the risk of impairment to the organisation’s business model, reputation and financial condition from failure to meet laws and regulations, internal standards and policies, and expectations of key stakeholders such as customers, employees and society as a whole. |
![]() |
The latest economic crisis has highlighted the need to improve the Risk Management processes and structures. More than trying to find the metric, Risk Managers and Board of Directors of Management companies will have to thoroughly understand their exposures and monitor them adequately. |
![]() |
Deutsche Fassung: Das neue Regelwerk zu Großrisiken |
Deutsche Fassung: PwC Liquidity Health Check für Banken
The financial turmoil shows how much the importance of liquidity management has been underestimated over the last years. This is why local and international efforts to put in place a much more robust liquidity risk management framework have taken a big stride over the last few months.
